🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial action to restrict social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate internationally. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and families are monitoring closely to see if this approach will inspire imitation for other nations.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a increasing group of states are considering comparable bans.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister arguing that phones and platforms are "stealing our children's youth". Legislation is expected to be enacted next year.
• Norway is set to implement a access barrier of 15, citing the need to protect children from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media account holders. Authorities have stated that an Australia-style ban remains "one of the tools on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on parliament to approve a law increasing the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a comparable action, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in the Netherlands has urged families to prevent their children from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has approved a advisory statement demanding a ban for under-16s without a parent decides otherwise is given. While it highlights of the "addictive" quality of these apps, the step does not create mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a good first step," stated one European lawmaker driving the measure.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Approach

For the United Kingdom, the administration has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "no option is discarded" but stressing any decision must be "based on strong research".

Earlier, support built behind a legislative effort to impose limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually watered down. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the topic.

Campaign organizations have raised concerns. An organization set up by the family of a young person who took her own life after viewing dangerous social media material suggests that a simple age ban may not improve online safety and could lead to a "cliff edge" of harm when users become eligible.

"This ban is a reaction to the refusal of the tech sector to create platforms and apps that are appropriate and age appropriate for children," said a influential peer.

America: A Fragmented Picture

Across America, regulation is primarily happening at the state level amid federal stalemate.

• Utah demands parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has passed a law banning under-14s from joining social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has approved a law capping under-16s to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with extra use dependent on a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise passed laws mandating parental consent for teenagers to open social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and calls from various politicians to copy this example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as improbable.

International Outlook

Beyond these regions, further countries are similarly exploring options.

• The Malaysian government aims to prohibit social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international bodies strike a more measured tone. The UN children's agency has advised that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even have unintended consequences". The agency notes that social networks can be a "lifeline" for marginalized young people and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to prioritize child safeguards.

Even as this global discussion unfolds, the policies of the Australian government and several other countries demonstrate that governments internationally are no longer willing to wait for platforms to make changes on their own.